12.15.07

Distinguishing Between Dashboards and Scorecards

Posted in Business Intelligence (BI) at 2:57 pm by irusgroup

We’ve planned, designed, developed and implemented many business intelligence projects over the years. Frequently, our clients ask us to distinguish between scorecards and dashboards. We found a good distinction in a white paper called Scorecards and Dashboards: Choosing the Right Solution by Panarama Software.

Both dashboards and scorecards are capable of summarizing key information that would normally be scattered throughout numerous pages of reports. Both of these technologies address some aspect of business performance. Dashboards and scorecards cannot, however, be used interchangeably, as each delivers an exclusive set of capabilities.

Users employ dashboards to measure and understand what is happening in the business right now within a context that is relevant to them. To help build the context, these information workers can define and manipulate information pulled from a variety of sources into a single visual representation of performance trends. Dashboards are often used to alert workers to exceptional and unexpected performance results, and users can analyze business drivers and trends – though not causality – from the dashboard application. Given their relatively low barrier to entry in terms of both price and ease of deployment, dashboards are more readily adopted than scorecards.

Scorecards, on the other hand, are used to see beyond what is happening throughout the organization into the cause-and-effect relationships between performance and strategy to help define what must happen next. Scorecard applications also enable an organization’s strategists to work together in defining and managing business strategy and action, and then communicate strategy and goals across the enterprise. Scorecards are a greater undertaking than dashboard solutions, and not only because they are often more expensive to acquire and implement. The deployment of a scorecard solution requires a deeper understanding of the organization’s needs and KPIs from the beginning to achieve the full business benefits. For organizations already using dashboards, most scorecard solutions are not an easy addition to these existing deployments due to lack of integration. As a result, the implementation of scorecards represents a completely new project rather than a growth strategy that ultimately yields a comprehensive performance management solution.”

12.04.07

Top Federal Government Contractors Added to Irus Navy SeaPort-e Team

Posted in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Federal at 2:29 pm by irusgroup

The Irus SeaPort-e contract has been bolstered by the addition of five major industry leaders over the past few months. Industry leading systems integrators AT&T Government Solutions (Vienna, VA), BAE Systems (Bethesda, MD), BearingPoint (McLean, VA), CSC (El Segundo, CA), and General Dynamics Information Technology (Fairfax, VA) are now part of the Irus Group SeaPort-e team. SeaPort-e provides engineering, financial, and program management contractor support services at the Navy Virtual SYSCOM, which includes NAVSEA, NAVAIR, NAVSUP, SPAWAR, Strategic Systems Program (SSP), and NAVFAC, as well as Commander, Naval Installations (CNI) and the US Marine Corps.

Chris D’Ascenzo, BAE Systems Vice President, Defense Solutions, said, “Joining the Irus Group team as part of the SeaPort-e contract is another way for BAE Systems to provide critical IT assistance to the Department of the Navy. We’ve been providing mission-critical services to the Navy for decades and look forward to servicing Navy Virtual SYSCOM through the Irus Group SeaPort-e contract.”

Click here to see the complete press release.